Biomass energy in China has been developing at a rapid pace. The installed biomass power generation capacity in China increased sharply from 1.4 GW in 2006 to 14.88 GW in 2017. While the energy share of biomass remains relatively low compared to other sources of renewable energy, China plans to increase the proportion of biomass energy up to 15 percent and total installed capacity of biomass power generation to 30 GW by 2030.
In terms of impact, the theoretical biomass energy resource in China is about 5 billion tons coal equivalent, which equals 4 times of all energy consumption. As per conservative estimates, currently China is only using 5 percent of its total biomass potential.
According to IRENA, the majority of biomass capacity is in Eastern China, with the coastal province of Shandong accounting for 14 percent of the total alone. While the direct burning of mass for heat remains the primary use of biomass in China, in 2009, composition of China’s biomass power generation consisted in 62 percent of straw direct-fired power generation and 29 percent of waste incineration, with a mix of other feedstock accounting for the remaining 9 percent.
Biomass Resources in China
Major biomass resources in China include waste from agriculture, forestry, industries, animal manure and sewage, and municipal solid waste. While the largest contributing sources are estimated to be residues from annual crop production like wheat straw, much of the straw and stalk are presently used for cooking and heating in rural households at low efficiencies. Therefore, agricultural residues, forestry residues, and garden waste were found to be the most cited resources with big potential for energy production in China.
Agricultural residues are derived from agriculture harvesting such as maize, rice and cotton stalks, wheat straw and husks, and are most available in Central and northeastern China where most of the large stalk and straw potential is located. Because straw and stalks are produced as by-products of food production systems, they are perceived to be sustainable sources of biomass for energy that do not threaten food security.
Furthermore, it is estimated that China produces around 700 Mt of straw per year, 37 percent of which is corn straw, 28 percent rice, 20 percent wheat and 15 percent from various other crops. Around 50 percent of this straw is used for fertilizers, for which 350 Mt of straw is available for energy production per year.
Forestry residues are mostly available in the southern and central parts of China. While a few projects that use forestry wastes like tree bark and wood processing wastes are under way, one of the most cited resources with analyzed potential is garden waste. According to research, energy production from garden waste biomass accounted for 20.7 percent of China’s urban residential electricity consumption, or 12.6 percent of China’s transport gasoline demand in 2008.
Future Perspectives
The Chinese government believes that biomass feedstock should neither compete with edible food crops nor cause carbon debt or negative environmental impacts. As biomass takes on an increasing significant role in the China’s national energy-mix, future research specific to technology assessment, in addition to data collection and supply chain management of potential resources is necessary to continue to understand how biomass can become a game-changer in China’s energy future.
References
IRENA, 2014. Renewable Energy Prospects: China, REmap 2030 analysis. IRENA, Abu Dhabi. www.irena.org/remap
National Academy of Engineering and NRC, 2007: Energy Futures and Urban Air Pollution: Challenges for China and the United States.
Xingang, Z., Zhongfu, T., Pingkuo, L, 2013. Development goal of 30 GW for China’s biomass power generation: Will it be achieved? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 25, September 2013, 310–317.
Xingang, Z., Jieyu, W., Xiaomeng, L., Tiantian, F., Pingkuo, L, 2012. Focus on situation and policies for biomass power generation in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 16, Issue 6, August 2012, 3722–3729.
Li, J., Jinming, B. MOA/DOE Project Expert Team, 1998. Assessment of Biomass Resource Availability in China. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing, China.
Klimowicz, G., 2014. “China’s big plans for biomass,” Eco-Business, Global Biomass Series, accessed on Apr 6, 2015.
Shi, Y., Ge, Y., Chang, J., Shao, H., and Tang, Y., 2013. Garden waste biomass for renewable and sustainable energy production in China: Potential, challenges and development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22 (2013) 432–437
Xu, J. and Yuan, Z, 2015. “An overview of the biomass energy policy in China,” BESustainable, May 21, 2015.
China shows leadership in most areas of biosphere livelihood generation far beyond the west’s linear-one-way-thinking, calculating & employing human fecal, kitchen-cutting, urine, agricultural-by-product, forest-harvest bio-mass. However both ‘exogenous’ (Latin ‘other-generated’) east & west have, through 1000s of years of colonial hierarchal exploitive 2-dimensional ‘agriculture’ (L ‘ager’ = ‘field’) denial, not understanding & rejecting the greatest biomass production of all. Humanity’s ancestral ‘indigenous’ (L ‘self-generating’) SYLVALIZATION’s 3-D POLYCULTURE ORCHARDS going back beyond the 7000 year threshold of 2-D ‘civilization’. Polyculture PHOTOSYNTHESIZE 92 – 98% of solar energy converted into food, materials, energy & water-cycle. TREE-ROOTS descend 10s of metres as deep into the earth substrate as the canopy is high, pumping water, mining minerals & creating life-nutrient colonies. 2-D ‘agriculture’ (L. ‘ager’ = ‘field’) only photosynthesizes 2 – 8 % of solar energy. Ager roots only descend short centimetres. Agriculture creates deserts through shallow roots leaving earth’s substrate hard-packed & ~ 95% of un-photosynthesized solar energy pushing dry winds from continent towards the sea. Polyculture’s trillions of square kilometres of leaf & bark surfaces in such as 500 square km, Polyculture condenses moist winds drawn by its photosynthesis created energy vacuum. Presenting little leaf & bark surface area, agriculture condenses next to no moisture. 60% of moisture transfer from ocean to continent is through condensation. Rain-Snow only amount to 40%. For these & many other bio-dynamic reasons, Polyculture (nuts, fruit, greens, vine, bush, vegetable, herb, mushroom) is 100 times (10,000%) more productive than 2-D ‘agriculture’. Polyculture’s equation has sustained life on earth abundantly for 100s of 1000s of years & is dearly needed again in our time. https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/design/1-indigenous-welcome-orchard-food-production-efficiencies